Updated Thursday 7th June 2012

One cannot help where the mind goes when it looks to make sense of a nonsensical world.  Each thought and question takes you outside of the square, only to find yourself in a larger one... and on and on it goes.  Each paradigm has its own army of "alternative thinking" gate keepers who have a vested interest in keeping your mind confined in their particular square.

To evolve from what we were to what we're meant to be, we must question ourselves and everything around us.  To that end we've submitted below a collection of thoughts and questions that many prefer we don't ask.  Feel free to email some thoughts of your own.

Many of the thoughts below originated from books, websites, mainstream and alternative media as well as conversations with others.   Most are not original.  They have been asked by many others over many generations;

They are not listed in any particular order.  When a new thought is posted it will generally be added below an existing similar thought.

Although this video clip ends with an image of police beating a protester into submission, in reality, it is everyone else that shames us into submitting to the approved way of thinking.  From our close family members, friends, teachers, high profile media commentators to politicians.  Most are the unwitting thought police conditioned to keep you from asking the questions that really matters.

       Searching for the truth is only dangerous when you're surrounded by liars.                               

Roman philosopher Marcus Tullius Cicero often asked "Cui bono" ("To whose benefit?")  This is the same question we must ask when trying to make sense of the countless contradictions and outright lies that our society has been built on.

Cicero also made this observation: "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear."

So who amongst us are making decisions that are beneficial to foreign entities and detrimental to kiwi sovereignty?  Have they pledged allegiance to another entity which over rides their allegiance to New Zealand?  If so, their actions are treasonous.

Where is the honour, in imposing the will of the tiny minority of foreign, fascist oligarchs, on people who have done no harm to others? 

Where is the honour in witholding certain information from the general public which you know, if it was common knowledge, would turn the turn the current power structure on its head. 

There is no honour in lying by ommission.

So you know our judicial and political system (or at least those aware of the deception) is a joke when judges are referred to as “Your Honour” and politicians and other appointed officers are addressed with the prefix, “The Right Honourable....” This makes an absolute mockery of the English language and an insult to the intelligence of even the clinically moronic among us.

One would wonder then, at what point in one’s political career do they come to the realisation that they are beholden to someone or some entity other than their constituents.  To carry on would at worst be treasonous, at best they are foolish actors reading off a script. 

Either way they're compromised. 

When we’ve had enough of being lied to by politicians, what do we do?  The routine is simple.  The media works us up into a frenzy and we’re encouraged to “boot the bastards out!”  We let off steam on mainstream talkback and social media and come the next election, we vote for someone else.  “We’ll show you! We're the people and we're gonna vote you out!  You wait and see!”

Oh really now?  More often than not the unpopular policies remain in place or repackaged and presented to the public again as a more acceptable “alternative”.  However, given time, the legislation will evolve to become as damaging, if not more so, than its original draft. 

And what of the politicians?  Probably enjoying a higher paid job away from the constant attention of local media...and having a good old laugh.

Many believe that all that is required for democracy to work is for more transparency in the decision making process.  But guess who decides that?  The very same people you're complaining about.  For arguments sake...let's accept that at some point they vote for more transparency.  That will only last until the next majority votes it away.  This is the nature of democracy.

Your unalienable rights are non-negotiable.  So even if New Zealand's entire population of over 4 million walked through the "Ayes" door when voting on the Search and Surveillance Bill...except you.  Then it cannot happen to you.   This is the nature of a Constitutional Republic.

New Zealand politics explained:

  A train called Zionism has over 4 million kiwis onboard.  Its final destination is a futuristic prison only large enough for the small percentage who are hand-picked to be slaves.  The rest must die.  Of course most of the passengers don’t know this.  They’re too busy watching rugby and Shortland St to bother looking out the window to see what’s ahead.  Every so often the train stops at a station.  The first is called "Monarchy".  A short distance further is "Democracy".  The next station is "Socialism", followed by "Fascism".  After many more years travelling it stops at "Nazism" then "Communism".  With each stop something changes within the carriages but the passengers can’t quite put their finger on it.  They sense it's not good.  The conductors are more demanding ...but that's ok because the onboard entertainment improves each time. The only hassle for them is that every three years they’re encouraged to vote for a new Prime Minister who gets to sit in front with the train driver.  The “elected” Prime Minister can only watch as the driver, a faceless, nameless private banker from the City of London has the controls.  When instructed the new Prime Minister must push or pull a lever to adjust the speed of the train, but nothing more.     

What's this "futuristic prison" supposed to look like?  Hollywood's been burning it into our minds for nearly a century now with endless movies depicting a very grim future, with movies like Grorge Orwell's 1984 to the animated Wall-E.   Of course we shrug it off as entertainment and when we see aspects of it unravelling in real life...not only are we not surprised, we are more accepting of it.  And anyway it can't be all that bad because the movies always have a happy ending, so surely someone is going to save us....right? 

While we wait for this hero to turn up, the world marches on into a global society ruled by an unelected handful of corporate oligarchs.  They own EVERYTHING and are therefore able to regulate EVERY aspect of our lives.  All information, especially on the internet, will be filtered.  The economy will be a cashless society where digital credits can be denied if you so much as think of speaking out against this new world order.  Your every move will be monitored both in public and at home.  All children are owned by the global government and will be vaccinated with whatever, whenever without parental consent.  All the food available to the masses will be genetically modified, thereby altering the genetic makeup of those who consume them.  The only people with access to 100% organic food and pure water will be the oligarchs and their puppets.  Those who refuse to comply are terminated.  Those who escape will live as outcasts in a Mad Max scenario...scavenging for food while watching out for thieves and bounty hunters. 

Say what?!  Mad Max?!  Pfft!  None of that can be true. 

Well I hate to say it but it can.  The necessary legislations are either in law now or coming.  We dismiss the authoritarian legislations over seas but those policies will become ours once our merger with the Asia Pacific region (APEC) is complete.  You think an existence for the outcasts, similar to that is not possible in this day and age...then try telling that to the Palestinians.

All that is needed is the biggest and most ambitious false flag operation to date to shift our thinking in favour of the sociopathic oligarchs. When we are frightened (mainstream media conditioning), sick (contaminated food chain and pharmaceutical poisoning) and ignorant (compromised education system)...then we will offer little or no resistance.

And just on the Palestinians...they're actually semites. Predominantly Muslims and many are Christians...but they are...semites.  The Anglo-Judaic (Europeans) who occupy Israel and oppress the Palestinians in their own home are NOT semites.  So claiming that those who speak out against the anglo-judaic people of Israel are anti-semitic is misleading. 

Those who speak out against the violent oppression of the Palestinian people are actaully pro-semitic.  The anglo-judaic oppressors are ironically enough, the real anti-semites.

Protesters who are vocal against incumbent ministers are for the most part "safe protesters" for as the old saying goes, "It doesn't matter who you vote for, the government still gets in power".  In other words the political system itself is never questioned.

The real threat to the established global power structure are not those who speak out against individuals or even groups... the real threat comes from those who quietly speak out against concepts that clearly do not work for the people.

Cognitive Dissonance is the confused look on ones face when presented with information that would potentially change their perception of the world.   At that point you’re faced with 2 choices...ignore it or check it.

Cognitive Dissonance is played out by those who feel threatened by the truth.  Many stand to lose everything they believed they gained and must protect it at all costs, including protecting the lies.  So first they will ridicule you...then attack you (sometimes with violence)...and when others accept it to be true, they too will quietly accept it also.  Of course they will play down the fact they were so easily fooled in the first place.

This highlights our main fault as a species...we are too trusting.  The political scientists throughout history have exploited this which is why we have found ourselves in the predicament we are in today.

(German Philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, 1788-1860)

So what’s the problem?

The problem is two fold.  One is we allow ourselves to be governed.  The assumption being that a complete stranger will have your best interest at heart.  Secondly, these same strangers then implements a fractional reserve, debt based monetary system, fuelled by fiat currency.

This has been without doubt, the most effective tool for human enslavement.  Not only that...it has been the mechanism for stripping of the natural resources of entire nations.

Isn't it interesting that Te Tiriti O Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi) is not law?  Instead parts of it and its various interpretations are referred to by statutes which are law.  Why?

Imagine if the Tiriti itself was law.  Article 3 declares us all equal as British subjects.  That article alone would throw out every legislation that favours Maori over everyone else.  This would open up a pandora's box that would tie up the court system for another 170 years.

Sovereigns have the right to make any choices they wish.  If a sovereign has subjects and favours one group over another then so be it and no legislation can change that.  Otherwise they wouldn't be sovereign.  In reality once one accepts the status of subjects they have no right to determine terms with the sovereign.

So we know every New Zealander who agrees with the treaty are subjects... but who are the sovereigns? We have the elected representatives in our legislative democracy we call "government".  However no bill can become law without the approval of the constitutional monarchy in England.  In turn this entity in England must abide by the policies and wishes of the fascist oligarchs of the City Of London.  So already there are three levels of political masters and all of their various off shoots and departments whose sole purpose is to keep you from realising that you were the sovereign all along.

We are often told that we have a representative democracy in New Zealand.  But time and time again the politicians ignore the overwhelming number of people who speak out against some of their more idiotic ideas.  Ideas such as the Anti-Smacking Law, Emissions Trading Scheme, Supercity etc.  Each time proof that the elected officials are not in fact there to represent their constituent, you, but they will give the appearance of doing so if it suits the agenda of the oligarchs the really represent.  So they are correct when they say NZ is representative democracy.  They are just not representing you.

If Maori really want to be free to determine their own destiny, they would first need to understand that it is Te Tiriti O Waitangi (Treaty of Waitangi) itself, that relegates them (and everyone else) to the status of "subjects".   Of course there are many activists who maintain that maori have an equal partnership with the crown to rule over the British subjects.  Not so.  It's quite clear...Maori ceded sovereignty.  By definition this makes them subjects.

Until Maori recognise they are sovereigns equal with all other sovereigns then they will forever remain subjects of the crown.

If for arguments sake maori did do away with the treaty and reclaimed their rightful place as sovereigns.  Their new found freedom would last all of two minutes because the moment they enter into any commercial agreement from anyone or accept benefits from other countries (corporations), they'll fall straight back into the same fascist system (admiralty law) they tried so hard to get out from.  If we maintain the path we're on now, maori will get more privileges, including the privilege to determine law, but they will still be subservient to their banking masters and therefore...still subjects.  They'll just be the best dressed prisoners in the block.  As that jewish banker Rothschild famously said "Give me control of a nations money supply, and I care not who makes it’s laws"

That being the case...rather than fussing over which politician we should vote for this coming election (November), wouldn't our energy be better spent learning about who exactly controls our money supply?

"Live for the moment", "Just Do It", "Image Is Everything", "Buy Now Pay Later!".  These are all slogans that define the Y generation.  This translates to, "Who cares what those old geezers in the past did or tried to do for us and who gives a flying f%$! what sort of world we're leaving for the kids...coz it's all about me me me.  Does my bum look big in this?"

This selfish "all about me" attitude was embarrassingly broadcast to the rest of the world right after the mass murder in Norway.  TV3's Campbell Live interviewed kiwi Cameron Leslie, who was only meters from the murder scene in Oslo.  With people dying what was this kiwi more interested in telling the world?  That he can bench press 165 kgs and that even though the bombing was taking place at that moment, "I naturally finished my set" before fleeing the gym.  Later he claimed it was a subtle joke for his mates in New Zealand.  Either way...this is the attitude of people who couldn't care less about what's going on in the world.

And that's exactly how the powers that be want it.

And just on the Norwegian massacre...isn't interesting that there were eyewitness accounts of two shooters, yet mainstream ignores this.  That his facebook was altered "after" the massacre, and mainstream ignores this.  That he had strong links to Zionism and Israel but mainstream ignores this.  Instead we're given the "lone gunman" who hated Islam angle.

Isn't it also interesting that Norway has been very critical of Israel's treatment of Palestinians and was making moves to recognise Palestine as a legitimate state.  It was also pulling out of military actions against Libya which ruffled a few feathers amongst the alliance.  As more information surfaces the more this man looks like another Mossad/CIA mind controlled asset sent in to derail Norway's attempt to make its own decisions.

Many people have woken to the fact that 9/11 was anything but the official story.  Within hours of any new tragic event people can spot the tell tale signs of a false flags attack.  It seems to have reached the point now that whenever any major tragedy occurs anywhere in the world, you can almost bet it was another false flag attack to force that particular nation back in line with the global zionist One World agenda.  Effectively nations that wish to determine their own future are being held hostage. The politicians may be aware of this, but the people on the street would be totally oblivious to the deadly games going on, on the geopolitical level.

The most common mind slave response with regards to government surveillance is "Well if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about do you?"

If you get close enough to look these people in the eyes, you'd swear you can see the back of the skull.

The four sides of this so called square we're conditioned to think within, is made up of the only four things most of us can talk about.  Side 1. Occupation-"How was work/school?" Side 2. Entertainment (Hollywood, Hobbies, Sports etc) -"Who do you think is gonna win this weekend?" Side 3. Media Talking Points-"Yes they should've jailed the whole Kahui family!" Side 4. Family (Of the four this is the only topic really worth talking about).

We have the same conversations about the same "safe" subjects, everyday until we eventually die.  Reality is never questioned, no concepts or ideas explored.  Nothing about the classics, history, spirituality or philosophy unless it's one of the sides in your particular square.  This isn't living.  It's simply existing in a psychological prison cell.

It appears that income tax in New Zealand is voluntary, much the same as in the U.S.  In our ignorance we volunteer large portions of our pay to the illegitimate government when we open a bank account (read the fine print).

http://www.mindwarpsectorfour.com/theprediction.html

Why does the government of New Zealand borrow money off the reserve bank at interest when it has the authority to create money itself without interest?  Current Act Party leader and former Reserve Bank Governor, Don Brash, presumably would be well aware of this yet remains silent.

In time democracy will be recognised as one of the biggest scams in human history.  If people understood the true nature of this system, the banner on this protest march in Auckland (2009) would’ve read “Democracy Becomes Dictatorship”

Why would Pope John Paul II sit in a chair (in Jerusalem of all places), which displays the satanic symbol of an inverted cross?

Who is more paranoid?

The innocent people speaking out against government spying on them...or government spying on innocent people?

You know our education system is going to hell in a hand basket when it becomes acceptable to write text speak in school exams.

There are some parents who still think that there couldn’t possibly be an agenda to undermine our children’s ability to communicate and reason.   Ironically, these same people stand as living proof that this agenda is already successful!

If people had the same passion for their unalienable rights as they have for their sports teams, the world would change overnight.

We all have a price...and the cheapest seems to be the politicians.

The beauty of fiat currency is that it allows he who has the power to print it to buy off almost anyone and thereby over time control everything.  If your price is too high they can simply find someone cheaper to take you out and replace you with another who is willing to play their game.  The best example being JFK.

This has been the modus operandi of the money changers since biblical times.

While we're on JFK.  The Secret Service, CIA, MOSSAD, Mafia and everyone else involved in his assassination would've saved themselves a lot of trouble if just one agent had slipped a drug in JFK's drink to induce a cardiac arrest.  A fake autopsy report would attribute his death to natural causes and we'd be none the wiser.   Yet they went through all that trouble with all those people and in full view of the public.

Amongst other things JFK threatened to shatter the CIA "into a thousand pieces", demanded Israel refrain from developing nuclear weapons and signed executive order 11110 which would've taken back control of the U.S from the international bankers.

The only logical explanation for his public execution was that it was a demonstration of power.  A message to every world leader then and since, not to mess with the private bankers and their fascist, global power structure. And no leader has dared.

Your thoughts create your reality...but are they your thoughts?

If you are only parroting the sound bites from the media opinion shapers...then your thoughts and therefore reality, is that which has been approved by the media moguls.

When you consider that almost the entire global media is controlled by only a few individuals and that it wouldn't take much collusion on their part to manipulate the collective opinion of the entire world.  Then you seriously have to question everything that you believed to be true.

According to the followers of The Venus Project (NZ has plenty on this bandwagon), the main problem with society is the monetary system (no argument there).

Their solution however is an Orwellian, cashless society where EVERYTHING is controlled by a central computer.  Nevermind that the people who control that central computer would probably be the same sociopaths who have ruined this world.  Never-the-less, if you can impress enough people with pretty computer graphics during the presentation...throw in the non-sensical, "Resourced Based Economy" line and the "Beyond Politics, Poverty and War" contradiction...there'll be people who come. 

As George W. Bush said " You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on"

Imagine a world where the technology is used for the betterment of mankind, instead of serving the needs of the global elite and their military industrial complex.

Only boring people get bored.  Hell they even made a TV show about boring people (Chawner Family) and we tune in to watch them watch TV!

We can never eradicate all the evil and negative influences in society.  Nor can the luciferian global elites eradicate all the good people in the world. It is the natural order of things and it is a constant struggle to maintain the balance.

Our social engineers are so insistent that we learn Maori because it's an official language of New Zealand that they've made it compulsory in the curriculum.  If that's their excuse then they may as well go the whole hog and make sign language, another official language, also compulsory.

We already sing our national anthem in both Maori and English so let's allocate one verse to sign language to accommodate all three official languages.  That alone would be worth buying a ticket to an All Black game.

What a shame the lone tree on One Tree Hill was cut down (1995) by Maori activist Mike Smith.  He stated at the time that it was a "A shrine to our cultural oppression."  It was a tree.  The worst part is that it stood only meters away from a real shrine, a Masonic obelisk that stands over John Logan Campell's grave.

If he was really upset at his white oppressors, then he would have been better to target the Masonic shrine and left the tree alone.

For those who are unaware, this is the same One Tree Hill that the Irish band U2 wrote of in their song of the same name. 

Just how influential is freemasonry in New Zealand?  And is there any truth to the claim that three of Auckland's most high profile politicians, John Key (Prime Minister of New Zealand), John Banks (leader of the Act Party and former Mayor of Auckland) and Len Brown (current Mayor of Auckland) are all high level freemasons? 

If freemasonry is supposed to be about doing good for society, then why all the secrecy?  Unless of course, the "society" they speak of, has nothing to do with the society the general public belong to.

It's that time of year again when vaccinated kindergarten kids are sent home as a precaution against the measles.

I thought the vaccine was the precaution.

I recently recall a doctor being quoted in the media that people who refuse to vaccinate their children are playing Russian Roulette with the child's life.  That may very well be true.

But after having looked into this, it beggars belief why people would vaccinate without question.  The number of cases of children having suffered adverse effects such as autism, with parents attributing it to vaccines, is huge.  There are cases everywhere and the drug companies don't front up but instead a selected few are tasked with the duty of defending the drug companies.  They will deny, deny, deny despite being surrounded by an ever increasing number of autistic and other adversely effected children.

The way I see it, injecting toxic chemicals into your baby... is also playing Russian Roulette.  The difference is you're playing with at least three bullets!  I think I'll take my chances with one bullet thanks.

"We advocate for the people".  Which people are they talking about?  The people are a diverse group of ethnic and cultural backgrounds each with their own belief systems as a group and as individuals.  So how can you be the advocate for the people when "the people" can never agree on so many issues?  Quite simply...you can't.

It would be more accurate if they said "We advocate for the some of the people, some of the time, providing it suits our agenda".  Of course politicians wouldn't last a week if they were totally honest.  So when you're approached by someone claiming they "advocate for the people", just politely pat them on the head and send them on their way.

It appears there is a "United Nations Weather Weapons Treaty" that was signed in 1976.

One question.

If they have the capability to create the conditions for rain, why are these nations standing by while the Africans die by the hundreds, if not thousands, each day from famine and starvation?

This leads to the anthropogenic global warming scam.  Along with the weather weapons treaty there are numerous reports of various governments manipulating the weather for their benefit, such as China with the last Olympic Games.  The overwhelming evidence is that the U.S HAARP project, uses Tesla technology not just to manipulate the weather but create "natural" disasters.

The scam is that they've convinced us that the erratic weather and increase in "natural" disasters are the fault of the irresponsible people and their carbon footprint.  Their remedy?  Tax the air we breathe with the National Party's Emissions Trading Scheme

Does anyone seriously believe that Alex Jones sneaked into Bohemian Grove with a camcorder and recorded a human sacrifice to Moloch while rubbing shoulders with presidents?  This is supposedly a very exclusive club with current and past world leaders who along with their security team all converge to this private forest in California.  And Jones just flashed his fake ID to get in?

That footage gained him millions of followers worldwide who believe he is leading the fight against the New World Order.  This man reeks of COINTELPRO (Counter Intelligence Program) and he accuses everyone else of being controlled opposition!  Jones is the Pied Piper of the "9/11 Truth Movement".

As for 9/11.  Between the expert analysis of Dr Judy Wood and U.S Military insider Dr Alan Sabrosky, we have the clearest picture to date of what transpired that day.   They provide enough pieces to show who did it and how.

The Zionist controlled alternative media (Alex Jones and Co) would have us believe it was the Neocons with controlled demolition experts within CIA.

The Zionist controlled mainstream media wouldn have us believe that it was 19 Muslims coordinated from a cave in Afghanistan.  This is the justification for the never-ending War on Terror.

911 “Truthers” often argue about the methods used to demolish the Twin Towers (WTC 1 & 2) and the Salomon Brothers' Building (WTC7).

 “It was thermite!”

 “No it was mini-nukes!”

 “No it was a  top secret, advanced military technology!”

Why could it not have been more than one method?  Is it not standard practice within covert intelligence for the compartmentalisation of operations?  They are only given the information they need to complete their mission and nothing more.  One small team could have been charged with planting conventional detonators within the buildings, oblivious of another team surveying the target for a completely different method.  It’s quite possible that everyone in the chain of command was left out of the loop except the corporate elites at the very top. 

People see evidence of one method and latch onto that as being the only method.  The problem with this is, the time wasted arguing amongst themselves.  Everyday arguing is another day for the real terrorists to push on with their agenda.  In fact there would be people within the truth movement whose sole purpose is to maintain confusion.  This is classic Divide and Conquer.

Speaking of war, both sides always loses.  The nations being invaded feels the full force of the military might.  Millions are killed and all the rest are physically and emotionally scarred for life.  Their resources and future are stolen by the occupiers who are there in the misguided belief that they are "helping".

The invading nations also lose.  Although they are spared the violence at home, the social fabric of their society also changes.  This is done when several new legislations which restricts the people's freedoms are rushed into law.  The justification from the political puppets is that, "extraordinary times requires extraordinary measures".  So both the invaded and the invaders becomes slaves.  The only winners in war are those who funds both sides because they end up owning both countries.

After a life time of fighting, U.S Marine Major General Smedley Butler questioned all this with his book "War Is a Racket".

At every opportunity it's drummed into our heads that 6 million jews were killed in WW2.  4 million from Auschwitz alone...or so it was written on the original plaque which greeted tourists who visited the former camp.  When it was shown by historians and researchers that this figure was physically, logistically and forensically impossible, the plaque was replaced (late 1990's)with an amended tally of 1.1 million killed at Auschwitz.  3 million simply vanished, but the overall 6 million total remains the same.

6 million - 3 million = 6 million.

It is illegal to question that equation in some countries.  In fact many have been persecuted, prosecuted and incarcerated for doing so.  The latest victim being Bishop Richard Williamson.  

Believe it or else.

9/11 fraud sent ripples throughout the world with governments everywhere passing their own versions of the U.S Patriot Act.  Here in NZ we have the Terrorism Suppression Act, the Search and Surveillance Bill, the militarising of our police force and the marginalisation through the media of middle eastern people (Ahmed Zouri & growing anger towards burqa wearing women).  In the midst of this manufactured climate of fear we had the Terror Raids of 2007 which captured Tuhoe activist Tama Iti and others.

Like the SIS case against Zouri, this will also be a circus.  However, the most frightening aspect of this case is that it may be before a judge only.  If we allow this to happen to the people in Tuhoe country then it will make much easier for government and its agencies to do it to you where ever you live in NZ.  We have to protect their rights as if it were ours.

September 2011 saw many of the above activists freed from prosecution on account of the police evidence being inadmissible.  In others words, the police evidence against them had been gathered illegally.  Yet the very same evidence is deemed admissible for four of the activists.  How can anyone take NZ seriously when we have this kind of circus going on?

Oh but it gets worse.  John Key's government then tried to make what was "illegal", "legal" by introducing retrospective legislation.  Their justification was that it would also jeopardise all the other cases where the police acted "illegally".

Can this seriously be happening in our Godzone?

The politicians were quick to point out that generally, retrospective legislations were abhorrent.  It's almost reassuring to know that they do have standards and actually do deem certain legislations as "abhorrent".

The real issue though is not the type of legislations or how they are passed, but instead, it is those which violates our unalienable rights.  These legislations are abhorrent.  Unfortunately for us they are passed just about every opportunity parliament gets.

Every summer in NZ there is the same old news item with the latest satellite image of the gaping ozone hole above Antarctica.  The media feeds us stats outlining our incredibly high skin cancer rate caused by over exposure of UV light.

But how can this be when the sun is always north of NZ and the ozone hole is south of NZ?  The only way this would be possible would be for the sun's UV rays that are travelling south of the earth to then turn up through the ozone hole.  Then like a guided missile follow the curvature of the earth while staying under the protective ozone layer as it heads towards the NZ beaches.

This is about as ridiculous as Oswald's "magic bullet" that supposedly killed JFK.

So why the lie?  Who benefits from such nonsense?

So if we reject the idea that UV rays are striking NZ via the Antarctic ozone hole and also accept the statistics relating to our horrendous cancer rate...then the obvious question is, "Why do so many people in NZ have skin cancer?"  What is it that we are exposing our skin to that is carcinogenic?

Seems like every month there's a cancer awareness week of some sort.  Breast Cancer Awareness Week, Prostate Cancer Awareness Week, Bowel Cancer Awareness Week and so on and so on. 

Here's a novel idea....how about we replace all these with one awareness week?  A Suppressed Cancer Cures Awareness Week? 

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the suppressed knowledge of the indigenous people throughout the world became common knowledge?  Their natural remedies we could just grow in the back garden.  Imagine also if during this Suppressed Cancer Cures Awareness Week, the general public was offered information on the works of many western doctors who thought outside the square, had a much higher success rate than conventional treatment and instead of being celebrated for their success...they were persecuted by the medical establishment.

Hmmm...why would that be?

Talk back radio ran hot over the New Plymouth Council's decision (Oct 2011) to end it's 40 year fluoridation of the districts water supply.  Surprisingly the vast majority of callers were in favour of the council's decision.  The arguments for and against were the usual discussions about the side effects and efficacy but only one caller hit the nail on the head.  The real issue is about mass medication without your consent!

If a doctor decided to medicate you without your permission, even though there was nothing wrong with you, he'd find himself dragged through the courts and rightly so.  Yet somehow many councillors around this country feel they have a right to do exactly that?!

The decision by the New Plymouth Council could be the tipping point for the rest of New Zealand to finally rid ourselves of this toxic waste in our drinking water.  It comes 12 years after the death of one of New Zealand's true scholars, Dr John Colquhoun.

After years of training and service promoting the mass medication of the population with fluoride, Dr Colquhoun did a complete about face once he analysed the available data.  The numbers didn't lie...he had been wrong all along and so began his campaign to rid our water supply of fluoride.    If only we had more scholars who value honesty and integrity ahead of their careers.

We all agree the moon causes the changing tide levels.  This in turn affects everything in the ocean and on the ocean floor as the huge mass of water is moved back and forth.  The changes may be drastic while others negligible, but there are changes none the less.

Would it not then be logical to assume that the moon is also having a similar affect on the much lighter atmosphere?  And wouldn't the atmospheric tides also change the dynamics of everything within the atmosphere?  Which leads to one last question: If the ocean tides and the subsequent behaviour of everything within the ocean can be predicted...then couldn't the same be said with the atmospheric tides?   This is of course the whole premise of Ken Ring and predictweather.com

Interestingly, the highly paid experts in the scientific community don't factor in the moon at all when they make their predictions.

And while we're on the topic...isn't it strange that no one's been sent to the moon since the Apollo Missions 40 years ago?!  You'd think by now the mafia would have built brothels and casinos there.

But there is always that doubt since that famous photo of Neil Armstrong with Buzz Aldrin's reflection in the visor and of course the shadow of an unidentified photographer without a spacesuit.  Doh!

The chemtrail spraying over New Zealand has been going on for some time.  Not a week goes by when there isn't any spraying.   Only once have I ever noticed two parallel trails over Auckland.  Unlike other parts of the world where the sky's criss-crossed with chemical trails that stretch from one horizon to another.  In the space of a few minutes these trails will expand to look just like any other cloud formation.  So unless you actually see the plane spraying you'd never know that the cloud descending on you is actually toxic barium and aluminium amongst others.

This is completely different to condensation (water) trails from the tips of the wings.  These are short in length and barely visible and of course, harmless.

Chemtrails show up quite often on TV shows, advertising and movies etc which can be explained away as just being in the frame during shooting and the producers and editors saw no reason to remove them from their shot.  No big deal really.  But when they show up in animated movies for children, then you know it was no accident.

The only logical reason would be psychological conditioning.  Through this subtle and repetitious conditioning our children will accept that thick white lines criss-crossing the sky is...normal.

States within States.  These states are where the puppet masters reside.

The City of London.  A state separate from the greater city of London.  This is the power house of the debt based fiat money system.

Washington City (D.C).  A separate state from the rest of the United States.  This is the military arm of the global elite.

The Vatican City.  A separate state from Italy.  In the last 200 years this has become the base for the perversion of all religions but especially Christianity.

How would one know if they're free?

If you can imagine a tesseract in its original (4D) form, then you are well on your way, if not there already.

“Father forgive them, for they know not what they do”.

( Luke 23:34)

Ok fine, I’ll forgive the 99.99999% of the population who blindly follow policies that are leading directly to their own demise.  But Father....what about the tiny minority of Satan worshipping, money loving, secret society scum who knows exactly what they’re doing?

What are we to do with them?

                                     We often hear that the Lord works in mysterious ways...well so too does Satan.                                                

                                   And there we were thinking it was just harmless entertainment.                                                   

Older New Zealanders would smirk at young Polynesians and Maori who dress, walk and talk like they're from some gang in East L.A.  We think we're much too old and wise to fall prey to such blatant conditioning from Hollywood.  We'll stay true to our own identity.  Be ourselves.  Think our own thoughts.

Oh really?

Socio-cultural conditioning comes in many forms through every medium, most of which are so subtle that many would live and die without ever realising they were mind slaves the entire time.

Speaking of which, don't forget to tune in to the 6 O'Clock News for your daily dose of conditioning jusifications for war and authoritarian legislations.

                   Education should always start with ABC..., 123... then Logical Fallacies.  When the kids have those mastered they'll change the world.                

Intelligence is as much about intellectual honesty as it is about one’s intellectual capacity.  On that basis...most of the people we look to for wisdom and guidance would fail miserably.

 Appeal to authority is the most common fallacious argument used by so called experts on just about...everyone else. 

“This is what I have studied my entire academic career, so I know of what I speak of”

“Blah!  I’m not having this conversation with simpletons!”

What is the common folk to do then when academics disagree with eachother?  When one refuses to answer questions from another?  Simple...turn the TV off and you research it yourself, then you decide.  Anything less would be, at best lazy, at worst, negligence.

It's important to remember that Dr Wakefield has publicly admitted that he is not against vaccinations.  He is a scientist and only wants to carry out legitimate research.  As he has said...the questions around the MMR vaccines throws the entire medical profession in doubt.  So for the people to have total confidence in the medical profession and pharmaceutical industry, he must be allowed to see his research through to the end...but then of course that confidence is dependent on his conclusion being in favour of the MMR vaccine.  

Appeal to Authority.  It would be more accurate to rename it "Appeal to Questionable Authority.”  An example would be if the Prime Minister, John Key’s science advisor Professor Gluckman, a paediatrician, promoted the “science” of Global Warming, which helped in the introduction of the Emmissions Trading Scam Scheme.  That is Appeal to Authority as Climatology is not his area of expertise. 

But this could also apply to some of those who are supposedly an authority on the topics they speak of... because how can they claim to be an authority in their particular field, when for whatever reason, they deliberately ignore facts that rebuts their arguments? 

If they have been compromised then their credibility goes out the window and their so called authority becomes questionable.

Hang on...didn't our country send young kiwi soldiers off to fight totalitarian governments, especially Communist governments? 

And now the surviving returned servicemen are told that on ANZAC Day, the one day to commemorate their efforts, they have to wear poppies made in Communist China?! 

Chances are, most of the clothes worn by the ex servicemen, as they march in the annual parade, will have the tag "Made In China".  If that wasn't bad enough...the many New Zealand flags flying high that day were probably also be made with communist slave labour. 

So... who actually won?

The Magna Carta signed 15th June 1215 is often looked to by those in western countries, as the document that will free them from their tyranical government.  As wonderful as this document is, it was signed under duress, which effectively makes this document useless.

This does raise an interesting question...the barons who fought against King John would've known that the magna carta signed under duress would be no good.   So why didn't they just kill King John, put in their own ruler, and start from scratch?

In any case, rather than looking for our connection to this document it should serve as a guide for every nation to use to draft their own constitution.

                                               These guys summed it up perfectly:                                                              

How deep is your love, how deep is your love
I really mean to learn
'Cause we're living in a world of fools
Breaking us down
When they all should let us be
We belong to you and me